Little Quiz for everyone.
#1
Posted 03 July 2008 - 11:52 PM
2.What is this?
3. Are they the same thing?
Rabbit,you need not post,as youve made your opinion known on MSn,and it isnt wanted here.
#2
Posted 03 July 2008 - 11:53 PM
There not the same length or width.
So you add in the little bit of me after I already posted.
This whole thing is about the diffrence between the Nazi symbol
and HK's sig
Edited by Rabbit, 04 July 2008 - 12:12 AM.
#3
Posted 04 July 2008 - 12:15 AM
#4
Posted 04 July 2008 - 12:28 AM
#5
Posted 04 July 2008 - 01:49 AM
Deadly, on Jul 4 2008, 01:15 AM, said:
It seems like HK likes controversy. His sig always has some kind of questionable thing in it. I personally dont like it but theres nothing we can do about it... I just hope for his sake he doesnt get jumped one of these days.
#6
Posted 04 July 2008 - 04:15 AM
Deadly, on Jul 4 2008, 02:15 AM, said:
I use it because it doesnt look just like it. What I use only looks just like it if a square looks just like a diamond,which it does not. What I'm using has its own history behind it,as does the Nazi swastika.
#7
Posted 04 July 2008 - 07:23 AM
#8
Posted 04 July 2008 - 08:16 AM
Remember kids, don't **** with the master.
Edited by Travis J, 04 July 2008 - 08:29 AM.
#9
Posted 04 July 2008 - 08:43 AM
And on HK's sig the Swastica was stolen by hitler because it repersents power. Because of hitler the swastica is now labeled a nazi symbol so i dont see a problem with it if hes meaning power and not nazis
Edited by Alan93, 04 July 2008 - 08:44 AM.
#10
Posted 04 July 2008 - 08:52 AM
#11
Posted 04 July 2008 - 11:08 AM
Alan93, on Jul 4 2008, 09:43 AM, said:
And on HK's sig the Swastica was stolen by hitler because it repersents power. Because of hitler the swastica is now labeled a nazi symbol so i dont see a problem with it if hes meaning power and not nazis
Thank you for getting it. Yes,I did originally plan on using the Nazi version,but,I liked this one better once I remembered it.
And Phoenix,you know where your opinion is filed already.
#12
Posted 04 July 2008 - 01:05 PM
To be perfectly honest man, i loved your old one, this one could set off somebody. Personally it takes quite a bit to offend me, but if eveyone was like me, we'd all be asleep...
#13
Posted 04 July 2008 - 02:38 PM
#14
Posted 05 July 2008 - 12:33 AM
phoenixsplash630, on Jul 4 2008, 09:52 AM, said:
Ok, so by that sort of logic, if I say where black, I could get offended if someone had an American flag in the signature or as an avatar because they used to enslave blacks and revoke them of there rights?
The Swastika was used by way more people than just the Nazi's, seriously, go to wikipedia and type in Swastika, you can see it used for thousands upon thousands of years as nothing but good before the Nazi's came along. It was used in every religion that I know of, in many countries including America as nothing but good omens, in America it was used for peace. So if you want to ban this, then I don't ever want to see someone with a flag in the signature, avatar or profile because I guarantee that all of them has had slaves at one point.
I'm going to be honest, when I first saw HK post this in the staff forum I was against it, but I didn't say anything, but now that I've done very little research I don't see a problem with it. And you know what, even if it is bent sideways it not a nazi symbol, look at this postcard, from America, that was made in 1910.
CASE CLOSED!
#15
Posted 05 July 2008 - 02:04 AM
The US flag is entirely different because it is widely used today and majority of people associate it with freedom etc. but the Swastika is very rarely used (atleast I dont see it often) and is associated with Nazi's by most.
#16
Posted 05 July 2008 - 05:14 AM
Unacceptable from a g-mod IMO, but whatever.
#17
Posted 05 July 2008 - 07:13 AM
#18
Posted 05 July 2008 - 03:06 PM
#19
Posted 05 July 2008 - 04:51 PM