0
2 New
Started by
King¦Mickey
, Nov 17 2009 04:49 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 17 November 2009 - 04:49 PM
#2
Posted 18 November 2009 - 05:08 PM
Now these are vintage KM!
I love the first one, especially lighting and depth and it has that white tone over it that makes it stand out alot, i would like to ask what Gmaps you use to colour sigs? The text ruins it for me though, but it really is a winner.
As for the second, again its a lovely sig, how you have created a zoomed pic and rotated it and still kept it looking fly is a great thing, Really liking the colouring of the second and it flows alot. I reckon you should make the text a bit higher on the sig and put a random box of white scanlines on a low opacity over the sig, do you mind if i grab the PSD for this. Next time on msn ;]
Great sigs here =]
I love the first one, especially lighting and depth and it has that white tone over it that makes it stand out alot, i would like to ask what Gmaps you use to colour sigs? The text ruins it for me though, but it really is a winner.
As for the second, again its a lovely sig, how you have created a zoomed pic and rotated it and still kept it looking fly is a great thing, Really liking the colouring of the second and it flows alot. I reckon you should make the text a bit higher on the sig and put a random box of white scanlines on a low opacity over the sig, do you mind if i grab the PSD for this. Next time on msn ;]
Great sigs here =]
#3
Posted 19 November 2009 - 07:39 AM
I like the second version more than the first. The colours are pretty neat the text works with this one quite well. Make the Text a little higher though, Other than that good stuff.
Onto the first Not too keen on the layout of the text or the colours too much beside that though this is still pretty nice but not as good as the second.
Onto the first Not too keen on the layout of the text or the colours too much beside that though this is still pretty nice but not as good as the second.