What type of matches do you want 08?
#51
Posted 18 March 2007 - 03:54 PM
ex. Christian's reverse DDT from ladder.
If they would refine the matches that are currently in, I wouldn't worry about new matches.
Also, for christ's sake let me adjust the time between entrants in Royal Rumble and Elimination Chamber matches. I've never seen an Elimination Chamber where the opponents came out every minute.
#52
Posted 18 March 2007 - 07:27 PM
#53
Posted 18 March 2007 - 07:29 PM
#54
Posted 18 March 2007 - 08:32 PM
#55
Posted 18 March 2007 - 08:33 PM
#56
Posted 18 March 2007 - 08:41 PM
RatedRKO*, on Mar 16 2007, 03:32 PM, said:
That would be awesome. There could also be finisher eliminations like Sweet Chin Music, Chokeslam, etc.
#57
Posted 18 March 2007 - 08:51 PM
I'd also like to be able to eliminate someone who's perched on the top rope. One more thing I'd love to see is the ability to go to the outside during battle royal matches. I'd like to see a 6-man HIAC battle royal.
#58
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:02 PM
#59
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:03 PM
#60
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:21 PM
#61
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:29 PM
#62
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:31 PM
#63
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:33 PM
oh, and match specific hot-spots would be nice as well.
#64
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:37 PM
#65
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:39 PM
As for an actual scaffold match, it wouldn't happen.
#66
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:41 PM
#67
Posted 18 March 2007 - 09:43 PM
#68
Posted 18 March 2007 - 10:12 PM
#69
Posted 18 March 2007 - 11:31 PM
#70
Posted 19 March 2007 - 11:43 PM
Guest, on Mar 15 2007, 06:28 PM, said:
Hard to implement, seeing as the last true game to have without hacks was ECW: Anarchy Rulz...For the original Playstation.
",last ride,"
We do that already in a parking lot brawl with the hearse finish.
"extreme rules with like 5000 weps,"
Won't happen, because the amount of weapons you want would drastically slow the game & would make for more (and longer) loading times.
"street fight,"
They had it in before, but realized that all it was was a modified Hardcore Match. I mean, why have three versions of the same match, with so little differences included when there's so much else that could be improved upon?
"i quit"
This is the one they should bring back, but this time, they should make use of the hot-spots to make the opponent say "I Quit", not just a bloody microphone.
"punjabi thing"
The match was only done ONCE and it SUCKED, so no thank you.
"What would really rock is a 200 light bulb tube match or an East Coast Ladder Match or some extreme death match like that."
If the WWE hasn't done it, then it won't be in...get this...a WWE game! Common sense tells one that. Same applies for anything from WCW, as Vince wants that company DEAD and anything Vince says goes, considering how his children (and HHH) will inherit the company one day.
"Humiliation Match"
No thanks. Those games had that feature for the pure reason that those games either sucked [as was the case of "Killer Instinct"] or were there to turn on the males (and some women) of the gaming world [as was the case with "Rumble Roses"].
"Also when people go to pick a Special referee, then the ref should be wearing the ref attire, instead of wrestling gear."
This was in previous installments, and like so much else, I wonder why this feature was removed, especially when it's realism that Yukes'/THQ is thriving for.
"'Extreame' hardcore matches on ECW"
The thing is, with Vince heading it, ECW is a shell of its former self, and essentially, all the "Extreme Rules" matches are Hardcore matches tacked on with the ECW name, seeing as--even in ECW--the talent (unless noted) have to wrestle under "WWE Rules".
"that'd be kool if they got more than 6 guys in the next game"
The reason we had only six for most of the installments was more of a hardware/perfomance thing on the part of the PS2 (because with each graphical "improvement", that shortened the amount of people that could be in the ring at the same time [as evidenced by Just Bring It, the first SD! for the PS2, that had 8 wrestlers in the ring at once]). Therefore, if the next game remains for the PS2, then we will still get six wrestlers maximum in-ring, because Yukes'/THQ wants to be "fair" to all customers (i.e. those with the PS2, those with the PSP, and those with any of the newer systems).
#71
Posted 20 March 2007 - 09:40 AM
buggy_blues, on Mar 18 2007, 03:43 AM, said:
Sorry, but I'm a realist and those matches that I've pointed out for various reasons might or might not happen. Common sense tells one that if WWE hasn't done--or won't do--something or they think it's a waste of time, then it won't be included, for each WWE game has to pass WWE approval, and guess who is head of creative decisions (including those regarding games)?
That's right...Stephanie Marie McMahon-Lavesque, daughter of Vince and wife of HHH. And considering how egotistical both men in her life--father & husband--are, she'll go with whatever they probably prefer is best for business (which includes roster decisions, match choices, and whatever other features might be good for byrate).
Edited by wwfpooh, 20 March 2007 - 09:47 AM.
#72
Posted 20 March 2007 - 10:30 PM
wwfpooh, on Mar 18 2007, 01:40 PM, said:
buggy_blues, on Mar 18 2007, 03:43 AM, said:
Sorry, but I'm a realist and those matches that I've pointed out for various reasons might or might not happen. Common sense tells one that if WWE hasn't done--or won't do--something or they think it's a waste of time, then it won't be included, for each WWE game has to pass WWE approval, and guess who is head of creative decisions (including those regarding games)?
That's right...Stephanie Marie McMahon-Lavesque, daughter of Vince and wife of HHH. And considering how egotistical both men in her life--father & husband--are, she'll go with whatever they probably prefer is best for business (which includes roster decisions, match choices, and whatever other features might be good for byrate).
Edited by buggy_blues, 20 March 2007 - 10:30 PM.
#73 Guest_Matty Matt Matt_*
Posted 21 March 2007 - 01:22 PM
BLUE_INC, on Feb 5 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
dttm667, on Feb 5 2007, 08:53 PM, said:
#74
Posted 21 March 2007 - 01:23 PM
Matty Matt Matt, on Mar 21 2007, 03:22 PM, said:
BLUE_INC, on Feb 5 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
dttm667, on Feb 5 2007, 08:53 PM, said:
#75
Posted 21 March 2007 - 03:23 PM