0
smackdown is starting to get really bad
Started by
xcrissxcrossx
, Jul 26 2006 11:17 AM
133 replies to this topic
#126 Guest_Stu_*
Posted 06 August 2006 - 12:18 PM
I was merely stating how, from my perspective, ratings should not matter when deciding whether a show is good or bad - but rather it should depend on the actual quality of the show. And I also wasn't disregarding ratings - because of course their what keep the company in business - I'm just saying that, in the end, they are just numbers and has little impact on how good the show is.
In fact, a thought just dawned on me. If a show is not getting as much ratings as perhaps it should, would the company not go all out in trying to make that right - thus making the show better? And the improvement of Smackdown over the past weeks could be proof of this.
In fact, a thought just dawned on me. If a show is not getting as much ratings as perhaps it should, would the company not go all out in trying to make that right - thus making the show better? And the improvement of Smackdown over the past weeks could be proof of this.
#127
Posted 06 August 2006 - 04:37 PM
The Legend Killer, on Aug 6 2006, 01:18 PM, said:
I was merely stating how, from my perspective, ratings should not matter when deciding whether a show is good or bad - but rather it should depend on the actual quality of the show. And I also wasn't disregarding ratings - because of course their what keep the company in business - I'm just saying that, in the end, they are just numbers and has little impact on how good the show is.
In fact, a thought just dawned on me. If a show is not getting as much ratings as perhaps it should, would the company not go all out in trying to make that right - thus making the show better? And the improvement of Smackdown over the past weeks could be proof of this.
In fact, a thought just dawned on me. If a show is not getting as much ratings as perhaps it should, would the company not go all out in trying to make that right - thus making the show better? And the improvement of Smackdown over the past weeks could be proof of this.
#128 Guest_Stu_*
Posted 06 August 2006 - 04:41 PM
What so Hogan's not a big name all of a sudden - well he won't be after Orton kills him at SummerSlam. :P On the subject of the newbies in Smackdown, some of them look really impressive - most notable would be Terkay. I mean, he's no Kurt Angle or anything, but he's done well in his first few matches.
#129
Posted 06 August 2006 - 05:38 PM
The Legend Killer, on Aug 6 2006, 05:41 PM, said:
What so Hogan's not a big name all of a sudden -.
#130
Posted 08 August 2006 - 02:08 PM
the reason they have low ratings is because their on UPN.
#131
Posted 08 August 2006 - 02:23 PM
xcrissxcrossx, on Aug 8 2006, 03:08 PM, said:
the reason they have low ratings is because their on UPN.
SD! Might get a tad better with the POSSIBLE reformation of the Hardy boyz. But it is eventually gonna die.
#132
Posted 08 August 2006 - 02:42 PM
Sev7en, on Aug 8 2006, 03:23 PM, said:
xcrissxcrossx, on Aug 8 2006, 03:08 PM, said:
the reason they have low ratings is because their on UPN.
SD! Might get a tad better with the POSSIBLE reformation of the Hardy boyz. But it is eventually gonna die.
#133
Posted 08 August 2006 - 02:44 PM
If SD! brings back the Junior Division for a 3rd time, rating would surely boost :lol:
#134
Posted 08 August 2006 - 02:46 PM
The Fallen Angel, on Aug 8 2006, 03:44 PM, said:
If SD! brings back the Junior Division for a 3rd time, rating would surely boost :lol: