26 replies to this topic

[Jericho]

As far as I know, The Undertaker has the highest overall... And I think that's BS. He has been gone for most of the year, and still gets a monstrous overall. I think 93 would of been high enough for him.

I think Orton or Cena should of been given the highest overall, only because they have been working their asses off non stop all year.

[MABITA]

Orton 95 (since he is WWE Champion)
Cena,Triple H and Taker 94
HBK,Batista and Edge 93
Jericho,Big Show and Punk 92

[ℜaven-Σffect]

Spoiler

Hornswoggle

105
Orton 96
Cena, Triple H and Edge 94
Jericho, Batista, The Rock 93
Taker, HBK and Steve Austin 92
Jeff Hardy and CM Punk 91

[The Fallen Angel]

I would have liked to have seen either Randy Orton or Edge with the highest overall.

[ministry of hell]

the undertaker 96

undefeted 17-0

this sundy you will now why

i see the headline in wwe.com new World Heavyweight Champion the undertaker to become the three time World Heavyweight Champion

[Ryan]

Taker 96
Orton 95
Cena, Edge, HHH 94
HBK, CM Punk, Jeff Hardy 93
Austin, Rock, Jericho 92

[Jericho]

Blooma, on Sep 12 2009, 05:38 PM, said:

Taker 96
Orton 95
Cena, Edge, HHH 94
HBK, CM Punk, Jeff Hardy 93
Austin, Rock, Jericho 92

That's my point!

How does Taker deserve a 96? seriously... He should be 92-93.

I like Taker but hes been gone for AGES! and only just came but, I dunno...

[koberulz]

Just because he's been away doesn't mean he's not any good.

[Tommy]

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

[Jericho]

Tornado, on Sep 12 2009, 07:03 PM, said:

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

I agree!

I dont know about Swagger though haha.

[koberulz]

Tornado, on Sep 12 2009, 05:03 PM, said:

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

What's a gimmick got to do with anything? Ratings are about kayfabe wrestling ability, not how well liked they are or how much they're around.

[Jericho]

koberulz, on Sep 12 2009, 08:15 PM, said:

Tornado, on Sep 12 2009, 05:03 PM, said:

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

What's a gimmick got to do with anything? Ratings are about kayfabe wrestling ability, not how well liked they are or how much they're around.

Thats debatable... If they are ranked by how skillfull they are in the ring, then why has Cena had one of the highest overalls in the last 5 years? I like Cena but he lacks skill in almost all departments except Charisma.

[1967 Spidey]

Braden Walker 101

[Sharpshooter93]

HBK should probably have the highest, but I don't really care about ratings. You can beat Taker with McCool on Legendary if you are good enough...

[Jericho]

Sharpshooter93, on Sep 12 2009, 11:05 PM, said:

HBK should probably have the highest, but I don't really care about ratings. You can beat Taker with McCool on Legendary if you are good enough...

You would have to edit her move set... There is no way her finishers would take him out.

[ministry of hell]

Milzey, on Sep 12 2009, 12:10 PM, said:

Blooma, on Sep 12 2009, 05:38 PM, said:

Taker 96
Orton 95
Cena, Edge, HHH 94
HBK, CM Punk, Jeff Hardy 93
Austin, Rock, Jericho 92

That's my point!

How does Taker deserve a 96? seriously... He should be 92-93.

I like Taker but hes been gone for AGES! and only just came but, I dunno...

but when he get back he make impact on the wwe & all the pepole like him right that is why deserve 96

[koberulz]

Milzey, on Sep 12 2009, 07:50 PM, said:

koberulz, on Sep 12 2009, 08:15 PM, said:

Tornado, on Sep 12 2009, 05:03 PM, said:

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

What's a gimmick got to do with anything? Ratings are about kayfabe wrestling ability, not how well liked they are or how much they're around.

Thats debatable... If they are ranked by how skillfull they are in the ring, then why has Cena had one of the highest overalls in the last 5 years? I like Cena but he lacks skill in almost all departments except Charisma.

He's won how many world titles? How much better can you get?

[1967 Spidey]

koberulz, on Sep 12 2009, 03:39 PM, said:

Milzey, on Sep 12 2009, 07:50 PM, said:

koberulz, on Sep 12 2009, 08:15 PM, said:

Tornado, on Sep 12 2009, 05:03 PM, said:

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

What's a gimmick got to do with anything? Ratings are about kayfabe wrestling ability, not how well liked they are or how much they're around.

Thats debatable... If they are ranked by how skillfull they are in the ring, then why has Cena had one of the highest overalls in the last 5 years? I like Cena but he lacks skill in almost all departments except Charisma.

He's won how many world titles? How much better can you get?

Its not based on skill. Its based on how well they do, like how many matches they win and world titles.

Plus at what Sharpy said, i agree. I beat Taker, Orton and Cena on a 3 on 1 Handicap Match with Kelly Kelly.

[koberulz]

Darkness Crabtree, on Sep 12 2009, 11:11 PM, said:

koberulz, on Sep 12 2009, 03:39 PM, said:

Milzey, on Sep 12 2009, 07:50 PM, said:

koberulz, on Sep 12 2009, 08:15 PM, said:

Tornado, on Sep 12 2009, 05:03 PM, said:

Meh, Biker Taker was the only gimmick I liked of his.

Personally, I'd have Punk and Edge at the top, 95 or whatever. Because in my eyes, they are basically the total package.
After that, It'd be HHH and HBK.
Taker, Orton
Kane, Batista, CEna
(Surprise) JACK SWAGGER.

EDIT: But it wont matter, becasue < Those guys over there will be 100 and will never, ever lose a match. Even when its 5 on 1.

What's a gimmick got to do with anything? Ratings are about kayfabe wrestling ability, not how well liked they are or how much they're around.

Thats debatable... If they are ranked by how skillfull they are in the ring, then why has Cena had one of the highest overalls in the last 5 years? I like Cena but he lacks skill in almost all departments except Charisma.

He's won how many world titles? How much better can you get?

Its not based on skill. Its based on how well they do, like how many matches they win and world titles.

That was my point. It's based on kayfabe wrestling ability.

[Sharpshooter93]

Milzey, on Sep 12 2009, 09:44 AM, said:

Sharpshooter93, on Sep 12 2009, 11:05 PM, said:

HBK should probably have the highest, but I don't really care about ratings. You can beat Taker with McCool on Legendary if you are good enough...

You would have to edit her move set... There is no way her finishers would take him out.

Knock out ref
Grab Steel Chair
Roid Rage with Chair
Random Attacks
Pin

[undertaker ba]

MY CAW Deserves the highest

Seriously though if Taker was able to work all year long just like Orton and Cena i am sure he would. However yes him being the highest over all does seem a bit much as no offense to him but he has had his fair share of injuries and such.

Also i am sure THQ/Yukes could have put in the option to let the user adjust Superstar Attributes. Online could then load the default attributes from the server, thus keeping online fair as can be and still allow the user to have control of their offline experience alot more.

[Ryan]

Milzey, on Sep 12 2009, 09:10 AM, said:

Blooma, on Sep 12 2009, 05:38 PM, said:

Taker 96
Orton 95
Cena, Edge, HHH 94
HBK, CM Punk, Jeff Hardy 93
Austin, Rock, Jericho 92

That's my point!

How does Taker deserve a 96? seriously... He should be 92-93.

I like Taker but hes been gone for AGES! and only just came but, I dunno...

Gimmick wise (rather than realistically) this is what I see being probable. Taker is always billed as the best the WWE has no matter what. Even if he was challenging Cena or Orton for the gold he still wouldn't be the underdog. That should reflect in the game. Orton's is obvious to me as well.

My only reason for Rock/Austin being loweer down on stats is because they never seem to over do the legends.

[momocop]

Taker is 10 times more experienced then Cena or Orton, And has beaten both of em plenty of times.

Taker is the dominiant because

1) 17-0
2) 6 Time World Champion (2 World Champion, 4 WWE Champion)
3) Most Charismatic person in the ring even after John Cena, HBK, Orton, or Triple H.
4) Has defeated almost every other world Champion.
5) Experienced all types of Matches, and has won most of them.
6) Most matches of his are usually 4-5 Stars (HBK vs Taker)

There can be alot more to him.

In my eyes, Cena lacks every skill in the game except charisma.
Orton is an all around wrestler and is only 29. Just him being head to head with Taker witha 95 Overall should be good enough. They have been here... 6-8 years when Taker has been here for 20+ years. He is 44 and still in good shape. Batista is only 41 and i bet he will be retiring on Monday

[1967 Spidey]

momocop, on Sep 12 2009, 06:49 PM, said:

Taker is 10 times more experienced then Cena or Orton, And has beaten both of em plenty of times.

Taker is the dominiant because

1) 17-0
2) 6 Time World Champion (2 World Champion, 4 WWE Champion)
3) Most Charismatic person in the ring even after John Cena, HBK, Orton, or Triple H.
4) Has defeated almost every other world Champion.
5) Experienced all types of Matches, and has won most of them.
6) Most matches of his are usually 4-5 Stars (HBK vs Taker)

There can be alot more to him.

In my eyes, Cena lacks every skill in the game except charisma.
Orton is an all around wrestler and is only 29. Just him being head to head with Taker witha 95 Overall should be good enough. They have been here... 6-8 years when Taker has been here for 20+ years. He is 44 and still in good shape. Batista is only 41 and i bet he will be retiring on Monday

If you looked above, its based on kayfabe ability. Plus all of those Taker points are invalid due to the fact stats are only relivant to the last year or so.

[Qasim_Akram]

john Cena 97 (just Like SVR 08)
undertaker 96
Shawn Michaels 95