People need to relax.
#1
Posted 12 July 2008 - 04:05 PM
People who are offended by HK (smith) because it "represents Nazism" need to relax. It's a symbol that has been used by Nazi's yes, but it has a long history before them of nothing but good will and peace. So people who are insensitive to that need to understand it. It's like if I take the American Flag and say, "Well, America used to have slaves, so I'm going to see that as a form of slavery." I'm just negating all the history of it, for one part of it. Just because it is the most recent history of it being used doesn't mean that its the only history we have to use.
This all has to do with how you interpret the symbol. Lets go back to the American flag, I don't actually take it as a symbol for slavery. So people see it as a symbol of American freedom, I personally see it as a symbol of American political corruption. Does that mean if I see someone with it I'm going to say they support political corruption? No. People interpret things differently, and if you know there side and can understand where he is coming from then it should cause no problems. Yes, the swastika has been used by the Nazi's, but HK was and is not referring to that so I personally see no problem with that.
I'm not here to make the people appose agree with it, but at least I want you to fully understand it. HK took something closely related to a symbol that in recent history has a bad rep, but in the whole history of that symbol it was not used as anything bad until the 20's when Nazism was created. But again, if I see someone with the American flag, I'm not going to accuse them of supporting political corruption just because I personally feel that a lot of that his happening in recent history more than the rest of the American history.
#2
Posted 12 July 2008 - 04:19 PM
Being half Jewish, I am incredibly offended by this. Think back to what happended in the days of Hitler. People being killed for things they can't change. Doesn't sound good. Now, this symbol. Is associated with those senseless murders. And you guys are saying it's ok to have. To make it even worse, HK made it directly to piss people off. HK, you can deny this, but we both know the truth. HK seems to not care that people are offended. He doesn't seem to care that the symbol was associated with senseless murders. I talked to him about it saying my ancestors were involved, and he said something like, "so, you're ancestors could have been major A**wholes and deserved it." How can anyone deserved being murdered over something they can't change.
What I am saying, is that I find it offensive. Many other members seem to find it offensive too. And, that is what HK wants. He wants it to offend people, which is so wrong. I'd bet, that if a regular member had done this, they would have been warned and had the signature removed in less than a day actually. Having that symbol is just as bad as saying [explitive] Jews! Which is totally wrong.
#3
Posted 12 July 2008 - 04:42 PM
Anyways, when HK said "Maybe they were *******s." He was referring to there personality that could justify the killing, NOT SAYING I AGREE, but it seemed like you misinterpreted that when I was reading threw.
HK purposely picked something close to what the Nazi's used, to help display his new persona he was going threw, a persona with new power, or something like that. Now apparently the swastika in ancient Egypt represented power, which directly cosines with his new persona.
HK saying "This didn't happen to you, so don't be offended" I don't agree with, sorry HK, but I do sort of view that as a douchebag move.
And going back to my first post, this has to do with how you interrupt it. Like you say the swastika didn't kill people but it is associated with killings, same could be argued for the American flag. I mean, this country was basically founded on almost committing a genocide on Native American's or by pushing them off there land. I mean, we gave the Native American's blankets filled with small pox, that we are immune to and they were not just to get some land. And you want to look at it now-a-days, if you rock an American flag, it could be seen as you don't support this country, but instead you support the war and that war is whole other issue of things that are wrong.
Now you are one of the only people I could see being offended by it seeing as you are half Jewish, but I think you need to fully understand it.
EDIT: Oh, and HK's symbol isn't like saying "**** Jew's", that would be like, referring to my fifth paragraph, saying now the American flag stands for "**** arabs" because we are at war killing, I would assume, prominently Muslims.
#4
Posted 12 July 2008 - 04:50 PM
if you're offended by someone putting a symbol that resembles one that shouldn't even be offensive to you if you're not Jewish, then you're overly sensitive. This doesn't need to be a huge discussion. If it really just PAINS you to look at HK's sig, there IS the option to turn off sigs on the forum.
#5
Posted 12 July 2008 - 04:59 PM
Edited by EvilMadness v2.0, 12 July 2008 - 05:01 PM.
#6
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:03 PM
Just like Pheonix, HK also told me on msn that he had it in his sig just to piss people off. I stated my opinion on it by saying that it is wrong, and no matter how tilted the sign was, It is still the Swastika. Then what happend you might wonder, well geuss what. He blocked me, just for stating my opinion on it. I'm not here to whine about him blocking me. I'm here to state my opinion. If HK sees this I will probably get a warning just for stating my opinion.
Then to top things off by saying "it didn't happen to you, so it has no effects", that just makes me laugh. That's like telling a black person that because it wasnt them who were slaves, that it shouldnt effect them at all. Of course it still effects them.
#7
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:05 PM
And in the lounge he said this is to represent my new Nazi persona, not my new "power" persona, or whatever you think it means.
Your justification by saying it's the same as the United States flag being perceived as a symbol for slavery doesn't make sense to me. You can't assume that because someone is pro-United States they are pro-slavery. Slavery was just something that happened within the nation, didn't actually make the nation. The Nazis all shared the ideas of racism & antisemitism... So yeah, that symbol carries a bit more to it than the Unites States flag does.
#8
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:17 PM
#9
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:23 PM
Like said, he didn't make it for a persona, he did it to piss people off. He did make the Swastika one too, but then decided to make The "Egyption Symbol of Power." Still, with the intent to piss people off.
Mickey, Yes I can turn it off. but it's still there really. It's more of a moral thing sort of. I am offended by it though.
Rabbit, I was blocked Four times for argueing with it. I also had racial slurs thrown my way.
Overall, it is wrong for HK to have that in his sig. It is wrong for anyone to be using it really. Especially if you want to piss people off.
#10
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:31 PM
According to the wikipedia article, its only other use other than nazism is for shamanism. So unless you are a shamanist (buddhist, hindu, etc) I seriously doubt that you are displaying that for anything other than nazism.
I'm not being accusatory, however. I don't believe that you have anything against Jews or anything like that. I just think you didn't realize how offensive it can be, what you're displaying.
Edited by Yournext, 12 July 2008 - 05:31 PM.
#11
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:36 PM
And, HK knows just how offensive it is. He has said himself that he did it to piss people off. So he knows how powerful the symbol is.
#12
Posted 12 July 2008 - 05:42 PM
Locked.
#13
Posted 13 July 2008 - 08:15 AM
1. Everyone has a different belief and or opinion about something. When it deals with a swastika, you better damn well believe that people are going to be affected by such a powerful symbol. You have many members and people out there in this world who still have grandparents or great grandparents who suffered because of that symbol. Just because your position on it is that "it's just a symbol" you better damn well respect that it's not just a symbol to someone else.
2. Most importantly, freedom of speech in the USA is only acceptable and a right when it is exercised with great respect. If you want to express yourself in a way that will greatly offend others, then your right is void. I don't have the right to kill nor severely injure someone just because of "freedom." Most teenagers take learning about the constitution and judicial system the wrong way and turn it into poison. They learn about how when you're 18, you're considered a legal adult and so they go on mouthing off to their parents about how they can do what they want, completely forgetting, that in order to do what you want, you have to leave the nest and bust your own ass for the things you want. Being 18 comes with a ton of responsibilities and not just freedom of being an adult. You also get tried as an adult and you also don't have mommy and daddy to be obligated to support you or bust you out of jail. Also, as soon as those teens learn about the 1st amendment, their ears become erect like a dog and so they convince themselves that freedom of speech, petition, etc comes with no price or repercussion. In fact, as I said before, the 1st amendment is only valid as long as you respect others.
3. Putting a swastika in your sig for the sole purpose to offend and piss people off is complete bullshit. I had assumed that the image was flipped because to my understanding, that symbol has a different meaning when it faces a different way. If it faced in the opposite way of the Nazi symbol, then I would let it slide ONLY until I receive complaints about it, which I did. However, the symbol was removed while I was in the process of answering PMs regarding the issue.
4. Someone mentioned that if the symbol bothered you in his signature, the solution would be to disable sigs. That was a very illogical and irrational solution. Why on Earth, should anyone have to disable viewing hundreds of sigs just because of 1?!
5. Devil, I agree with Showtime, and I don't think your analogy of the US Flag to Slavery was close in relation to a Nazi symbol and everything that symbol stood for. The American flag stands for so much more than slavery (which was down south where they had a Confederate flag mind you), but still the US Flag's purpose an intent was not to enslave the entire world. The Nazi symbol stood for many things, all of which were very bad, including genocide.
6.
Quote
My jaw dropped on that line. WTF? It's like you're trying to manipulate him into not being offended because he's ignorant for not understanding the Nazi symbol according to you. Seriously, WTF? I'm very sure he understands that symbol of hate. Trying to make him understand it the way you want to perceive it does not make it any better.
7. I want to ask everyone here how many versions of the swastika were put up? I ask because I keep hearing how it was flipped, not flipped, or slightly tilted. If it was facing the same direction as a true Nazi symbol, I would like to apologize for not taking action immediately. When I first saw one of the incarnations of the symbol, I thought it was flipped to mean something else because I didn't take HK for one to be throwing up such a symbol. I assume that while I have been away, he put up more versions of the symbol. Am I correct?
I'm going to unlock this now because I think it's total BS that it gets locked for people having valid reasons to be against such a filth symbol of hate.
#14
Posted 13 July 2008 - 08:51 AM
#15
Posted 13 July 2008 - 09:09 AM
Ive also heard of msn conversations where HK says he's only doing it to piss people off. As in he used history as an excuse to try and justify using it.
And it pissed us off more that he locked topics for no good reason, like he felt we didnt have a right to question it or something.
I don't hate HK but I've lost respect for him.
#16
Posted 13 July 2008 - 09:13 AM
#17
Posted 13 July 2008 - 09:24 AM
JB, on Jul 14 2008, 01:09 AM, said:
I don't hate HK but I've lost respect for him.
I've had something similiar with him. I know what you mean when you say I've lost respect for him.
@ Sergio you mention about freedom off speech in the USA. What about us Australians? Give us a go lol.
#18
Posted 13 July 2008 - 09:27 AM
#19
Posted 13 July 2008 - 09:56 AM
Quote
It has been used in many Asian tradtions, it has been used in Native American traditions. So, as you can see, there is a much longer and wider history then you guys are referring to, and you know what, I could of made this long and even more in depth. And yournext, all of this is I got from the Wikipedia link you posted.
Sergio, on Jul 13 2008, 09:15 AM, said:
1. Everyone has a different belief and or opinion about something. When it deals with a swastika, you better damn well believe that people are going to be affected by such a powerful symbol. You have many members and people out there in this world who still have grandparents or great grandparents who suffered because of that symbol. Just because your position on it is that "it's just a symbol" you better damn well respect that it's not just a symbol to someone else.
2. Most importantly, freedom of speech in the USA is only acceptable and a right when it is exercised with great respect. If you want to express yourself in a way that will greatly offend others, then your right is void. I don't have the right to kill nor severely injure someone just because of "freedom." Most teenagers take learning about the constitution and judicial system the wrong way and turn it into poison. They learn about how when you're 18, you're considered a legal adult and so they go on mouthing off to their parents about how they can do what they want, completely forgetting, that in order to do what you want, you have to leave the nest and bust your own ass for the things you want. Being 18 comes with a ton of responsibilities and not just freedom of being an adult. You also get tried as an adult and you also don't have mommy and daddy to be obligated to support you or bust you out of jail. Also, as soon as those teens learn about the 1st amendment, their ears become erect like a dog and so they convince themselves that freedom of speech, petition, etc comes with no price or repercussion. In fact, as I said before, the 1st amendment is only valid as long as you respect others.
3. Putting a swastika in your sig for the sole purpose to offend and piss people off is complete bullshit. I had assumed that the image was flipped because to my understanding, that symbol has a different meaning when it faces a different way. If it faced in the opposite way of the Nazi symbol, then I would let it slide ONLY until I receive complaints about it, which I did. However, the symbol was removed while I was in the process of answering PMs regarding the issue.
4. Someone mentioned that if the symbol bothered you in his signature, the solution would be to disable sigs. That was a very illogical and irrational solution. Why on Earth, should anyone have to disable viewing hundreds of sigs just because of 1?!
5. Devil, I agree with Showtime, and I don't think your analogy of the US Flag to Slavery was close in relation to a Nazi symbol and everything that symbol stood for. The American flag stands for so much more than slavery (which was down south where they had a Confederate flag mind you), but still the US Flag's purpose an intent was not to enslave the entire world. The Nazi symbol stood for many things, all of which were very bad, including genocide.
6.
Quote
My jaw dropped on that line. WTF? It's like you're trying to manipulate him into not being offended because he's ignorant for not understanding the Nazi symbol according to you. Seriously, WTF? I'm very sure he understands that symbol of hate. Trying to make him understand it the way you want to perceive it does not make it any better.
7. I want to ask everyone here how many versions of the swastika were put up? I ask because I keep hearing how it was flipped, not flipped, or slightly tilted. If it was facing the same direction as a true Nazi symbol, I would like to apologize for not taking action immediately. When I first saw one of the incarnations of the symbol, I thought it was flipped to mean something else because I didn't take HK for one to be throwing up such a symbol. I assume that while I have been away, he put up more versions of the symbol. Am I correct?
I'm going to unlock this now because I think it's total BS that it gets locked for people having valid reasons to be against such a filth symbol of hate.
1. I know what you are trying to say, but that symbol didn't kill people. Its like saying, "The American flag is at war." Its not a symbol that kills people, its a person that kills people.
2. I'm know for a fact that you can go outside and wear a swastika, hell, my friend said that a bunch of neo-nazi's came into his dad's or uncles restaurant dressed up like that, and wiping there feet on the Jewish flag. Do I agree with that? Of course not, but you can do things like this as long as you don't disturb the peace.
3. I don't agree with why he did it, I'm not trying to justify that. But I've posted a few times of a postcard that was from American in which it has the Swastika the exact same way it was depicted on the Nazi's uniforms and flags ect. ( http://en.wikipedia....wastica1910.jpg ). So, I don't believe that the Swastica turned one way means Nazi or whatever.
4. I feel like I have to comment on every thing, but uh...I honestly don't know.
5. Slavery was everywhere Sergio, I mean in the 50's and 60's where blacks where fighting for their freedom they where exactly home free if they came up north. Because like with what Martin Luther King tried to prove that the south had mainly had De Jure Segregation (by law) and the north had De Facto Segregation (by custom). And in many ways we still have De Facto segregation, but thats a whole other issue. The point I was trying to have before my little tangent is that every place had slaves, every state that we had had slaves. It wasn't just the south. And you seem like you at least understood what I was trying to do with that comparison, so thank you. But then you said the flags intent was not to enslave people, do you think the person that created the Swastika wanted it to be used as it was by Hilter? Point being, that not everything that is intended to be a certain way turns out that way. As far as the Genocide, all I'm going to say is, Native Americans.
6. I'm not trying to say he doesn't know its a symbol for hate, I'm saying he most likely doesn't know the history of it. About where it was used before, how it was used ect. He only knows the part that happened in the most recent history. My thought process behind that was, maybe if he understand that fully he, while may not like it, will at least understand what he is doing with it. That even both of the Faiths he practices used that symbol as good.
7. I think he had three different sigs with that. One was sideways but he changed that quickly, one was the same type of design but not sideways, then the other had the same swastika but it said "It didn't happen to you so it doesn't matter" or something along those lines.
#20
Posted 13 July 2008 - 09:56 AM
EDIT: Oops, lol...this isn't proboards...lol Im WAY behind times. But still, whatever is hosting this website, is most likely based in America. That means that American laws are used.
Edited by Yournext, 13 July 2008 - 10:06 AM.
#21
Posted 13 July 2008 - 10:27 AM
You have to understand that that symbol is a very powerful symbol that has left a very strong and impactful bearing on all those who have some connection as a result of Hitler's regime. Many countries, religions, races, people, etc, were affected by Hitler and his symbol. Of course a symbol is not going to kill, but it has depth and meaning and it stands for something. Many Germans fought against their will because either you follow or die. The British & French fought and lost many men to Hitler's cause. Many countries fell, many Jews died, many people were affected and the stories have lived on. Even the Japanese in America were affected because they were quarantined due to Pearl Harbor. The Japanese who attacked us on American soil, were allies to that Nazi symbol. Little did those idiots know, that Hitler would kill them too. Hitler would have probably killed the Italians too despite them feeling so powerful as a ally to Hitler.
The point is, that when you show or mention a swastika, you are treading on thin ice with some people because it is a touchy subject to them. We need to respect them despite our personal feeling. The history of the swastika has 0% to do with what impact Hitler brought to it.
Slavery in the USA, despite it being abolished, is still a touchy subject with many African Americans. They were referred to as "niggers" and they didn't like it. They call themselves niggers amongst each other glorifying the damn word like it's something street, cool, or full of pride. The minute someone who is not black says ******, they start throwing a shit fit because to them, you automatically said it to insult them or the stupidest reason ever from them is that you can't say it because it's offensive regardless of the situation, if you are not black. Anyway, my point is that slavery/discrimination is a touchy subject to a select few still and we have to respect that.
Also, slavery was not exclusive to the USA. It's been around since ancient times. Ask the Jews, ask the Egyptians, ask the Mexicans, ask the Native Americans, ask the Chinese.
Also, the point here is that HK put up the image to piss people off on purpose and there is no reason to bring up the origin of the swastika. It holds no bearing for what was intended by HK. He wasn't trying to educate anyone. If this was being debated before Hitler started his rise to power, then it would be a whole other story because no one would find any offense to the symbol. However, we are living past a time in which the symbol was used for hate, and we must be prepared to understand that it is offensive to certain people.
#22
Posted 13 July 2008 - 12:17 PM
Gee chill you know.
#23
Posted 13 July 2008 - 01:34 PM
Sergio, on Jul 13 2008, 03:15 PM, said:
Sergio, on Jul 13 2008, 03:15 PM, said:
#24
Posted 13 July 2008 - 02:21 PM
Also everybody knows HK was just using the history as a shield, he intended to offend. There for the other history doesnt matter as it is irrelevant to this, it was only brought up to hide the fact the HK wanted to offend.
#25
Posted 13 July 2008 - 02:33 PM