76 replies to this topic

[Joe Smith]

This topic actually made me laugh out loud lol.

[wwfpooh]

::MooseOfDoom::, on Apr 24 2006, 10:07 PM, said:

wwfpooh, on Apr 9 2006, 06:55 PM, said:

ThreeG, on Apr 9 2006, 05:30 PM, said:

I find it funnier people thought it was real. XD

Dude. No need to bash Cena for doing his job. You'd do the same damn thing if you were in his shoes, so no need to knock him for WWE management putting him in the "must-be-over-babyface-with-the-five-moves-of-doom" position, for many wrestlers (including Vince's own son-in-law, HHH) are hindered by the management's lack of ideas (Stephanie, as head of creative, is the only one to put in decent ideas, but most focus around her husband; LOL) & the fact that WWE fans that fill the seats in the crowd are 90% marks (those that do as WWE ask them too; i.e. cheer and boo for whom the WWE chooses, for WWE knows that other fans--Three G, included--despise Cena & his gimmick, so they try to make money off of this hatred), whereas most other fans are open-minded and aren't afraid to tell WWE where to stuff some of their ideas...

all i gotta say is u ruined it, cuz fans and non-fans were laughing at it and u had to ruin it...j/k...or am i? u make the call, heres the number 548-436-8595...thats the funniest thing ive heard all day...OMGROFLMAO!!!

Dude, I was stating the truth. There's NO point in hating a human being for doing what he's told to keep his job.

True, some angles in the WWE have truly sunk the promotion (ex: for Kane, the Katie Vick angle & the Matt Hardy/Lita/Edge fued; ex: for Rey, the "custody" angle & the current "Eddie's down there...in hell" angle...both of which were--ironically enough--Rey's ideas), but there's no need to bash (hate, dislike emensely, whatever you term it) a person simply because of the gimmick the promotion slaps on him.

For example, I depised Lesnar for selling out (dissing the company, flipping the fans off, etc. & basically being an ass like Goldberg used to be), but does that mean I'll be riding on his coattails, attacking the man at every turn? No, because, as Sergio said, "Being 21 means that I can differenciate the point of a wrestler", and as such, I refuse to hate on a man for doing as he's told, even if his gimmick has gotten emensely stale.

I don't blame Cena (and many others), but I do blame WWE creative management, because, aside from Steph and JR (head of creative and head of relations), most of the current WWE writing staff doesn't know jack about the WWE's past (ex: Kane's backstory BEFORE the Katie Vick angle), where they are going (ex: the brand split has a good side and a bad side: good--allows unforeseen talent to shine; bad--shows the same talent over and over, with mediocre fueds), and where they are (ex: being outwatched by a fledgling TNA, for many a former WWE fan has converted to that promotion, hoping for a change of pace, style, and innovation).